I read a lot. It’s part of my beliefs. Unfortunately, 95% of what I encounter is unreadable. As in, unreadable in its stupidity, meaninglessness and pointlessness. I attribute this directly to the fact that there is no place in this world for the woman with 105 IQ.
Because I complain a lot about what I have to read for this blog, and because I can never do enough for The Madame, I have been charged with writing a post about the stupidest thing I have read in the last seven days. The hardest part will be picking only one winner every week.
In light of The Countess’s affinity for all things draggy, Mock U will be looking slightly different for a while. But! Fear not, dear readers, Mock U’s most important characteristics, i.e., education and ridicule, will be in full effect, for they are constants we all can rely on in this cruel, uncertain world. Let’s get to it, shall we?
Admittedly, I read it a few weeks ago, but this article about a woman who walked into an art museum in Denver and (I quote) “pulled her pants down to slide her buttocks against” a painting was too perfect for me to disregard even if I failed to report on it immediately. Apparently, the woman did succeed in “sliding her buttocks” against the painting and there was some urination involved after the fact (the details are mercifully vague on that last point). Regardless, she caused substantial damage to the piece (which is valued at $30 million) and was charged with felony criminal mischief for her behavior.
The painting in question is a piece done by one Clyfford Still, an abstract expressionist (meaning he painted blocks of color on canvas) who was a predecessor to, and alleged influence on, painters like Pollack and Rothko. Although he never realized the notoriety of his successors, and even though places like the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York City and the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art already had “major holdings” of his paintings, the City of Denver dedicated an entire museum to his artwork. (I guess the museum in Denver is full of what the other museums didn’t want?)
I have always viewed the value in modern/abstract art to be more about statement than skill or aesthetics. In her own way, then, this woman has made a contribution to the world of modern art. As far as I am concerned, she has become part of the discussion. Seriously, is there is a more literal way to demonstrate one’s distaste for an artwork, or one’s desire to debunk the conventional wisdom surrounding what art is and how to value it? There may be a more fun and stylish way to express such thoughts (see below), but I can’t imagine one more straightforward.
On the other hand, considering that she looked like this during the crime (or shortly thereafter), her actions may have been motivated by something other than rational thought.
Regardless of whether she thought she was being profound or if she was just being crazy, I think we can all appreciate the fact that she wiped her bare ass on an overvalued painting.
-Baroness von Jeer
